Personal tools
Document Actions

Andersen 1995

                                                  Biological Conservation71 (1995) 223   230
                                                       ,~ 1995 Elsevier Science Limited
                                                  Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
                                                           0006-3207/'95/$09.50+.00
ELSEVIER                     0006-3207(94)00031-X


  RESISTANCE OF DANISH COASTAL VEGETATION TYPES TO
          H U M A N TRAMPLING

                          Ulla Vogt Andersen
    Botanical Section, Department of Botany, Dendrology and Forest Genetics, Royal Veterinary & Agricultural University,
                    Rolighedsvej 21, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

           (Received 14 January 1994; revised version received 20 May 1994; accepted 8 June 1994)




Abstract                                1970; Hosier & Eaton, 1980), and loss of biodiversity
Five coastal communities under influence o f human tram-        (McDonell, 1981). Because the impact results in soil
pling, i.e. a natural salt marsh, a natural dune, a man-        modification, the changes in vegetation composition
made dune, and two man-made coastal grasslands, were          and structure can be irreversible (Beeftink, 1979). Low
studied. The vegetation of five paths (one in each com-        levels of trampling can, however, have a beneficial infl-
munity) created and sustained by, human trampling was         uence on species diversity (Liddle & Greig-Smith, 1975b;
analysed with respect to floristic composition and species       Boorman & Fuller, 1977), by keeping the communities
cover. The total number of vascular plant species, species       in a dynamic stage (Magnusson, 1986).
diversity', and the total vegetation cover were significantly       Careful planning of recreational impact is necessary
reduced. The therophytes and hemicryptophytes were sig-        and a knowledge of the resistance of seashore communi-
nificantly reduced, while the geophytes were indifferent to      ties is an important basis for planners. The aims of the
the impact o f human trampling. Man-made and natural          p, esent study were to compare the vulnerability of five
dunes were most vulnerable, coastal grasslands were          different plant communities, i.e. a natural salt marsh, a
intermediate, and the salt marsh was the most resistant        natural dune, a man-made dune, a man-made coastal
to human trampling.                          grassland under management, and a man-made coastal
                                    grassland without management. These communities were
Keywords: human trampling, disturbances, species re-          analysed with emphasis on (1) the trampling-induced
sistance, man-made ecosystems, coastal communities.          changes in vegetation composition and species diversity;
                                    (2) the ability of individual species to withstand injury; and
                                    (3) the possible differences in resistance between man-
INTRODUCTION
                                    made and natural coastal areas and between managed
For holiday makers of Northern Europe seashores rank         and unmanaged plant communities. Plant nomenclature
among the most attractive areas. At present, employ-         follows Hansen (1981).
ment and income in many coastal areas are largely
dependent on the tourist industry, and tourism is a growth
                                    STUDY AREAS
sector with a large potential in economic terms (Meijer,
1992; Jensen, 1993). Tourist activities, however, can         The studies were made in Denmark in Koge Bay Sea-
have severe effects on coastal areas, and contribute to        side Park and Olsemagle Revle (Fig. 1), both offshore
their destruction and reduction of their nature and          barriers situated 20 km apart, on the coast of the Baltic
recreational values. A direct result of leisure activities is     Sea. Olsemagle Revle was created by natural processes:
disturbance to the flora and fauna. Several researchers        interaction of sand deposition and plant growth during
have studied the impact of human trampling in dunes          the period 1900-1930. In contrast, Koge Bay Seaside
and other seashore plant communities. The natural re-         Park was planned by architects and constructed for
sponses are soil compaction (Bates, 1935; Liddle &           recreational purposes, in the years 1978-1980.
Greig-Smith, 1975a), reduction in soil organic matter           Olsemagle Revle covers 200 ha and consists of a 5
(Boorman & Fuller, 1977; Hylgaard & Liddle, 1981),           km sandy beach with a well-developed strandline vege-
decrease of vegetation cover (Burden & Randerson,           tation, a row of dunes with a height of approximately 3
1972; Bowles & Maun, 1982), decrease in biomass pro-          m, and a salt marsh with a Phragmites-Scirpus swamp
duction (Edmond, 1962; Liddle & Greig-Smith, 1975b),          on the landward side of the barrier which encloses a
reduction in number of flowering species (Goldsmith et         lagoon. The salt marsh has never been grazed or mown.
al., 1970; Hylgaard, 1980), disappearance of vulnerable        The only man-made facility is a constructed dam with
species (Bates, 1935; Chappel et al., 1971), creation of        an access road. A comprehensive study of the vegeta-
paths (Bayfield, 1973; Hylgaard & Liddle, 1981),            tion was made by Gravesen and Vestergaard (1969).
erosion (Frederiksen, 1977; Carlson & Godfrey, 1989),           Koge Bay Seaside Park covers 500 ha and consists
interference in the natural succession (Goldsmith et al.,       of 8 km of sandy beach with 3-m high artificial dunes
                                 223
224                                      Ulla Vogt Andersen

               1 Kege Ba' _Seaside Park




                                          N
                       ,,, ..,    t.~....o,~.   .
                  )a~'~'~'~3~ ~           ~       Lagoon
             ¢     •     f~.~     t';,.....                           ~\,.:--,~-~.,j....~,...<



             ~       :~                          ..  ~~ ,.,...~..~. ":
                                                         ~,...




             "       ~       '        ~               Baltic Sea


                     LEGEND:

               L~] Parking lot
               []    Dunes
               i~!    Mainlandbehind original coastline
                    Road with vehicle access
                    Constructed path/bike lane
               . . . . Path created by human trampling
                    Sites where surveys a r e undertaken
                    Study area




Fig. 1. Map showing the location of the study areas in Denmark (inset bottom left), and the position of the study sites 1-5 in
               Kege Bay Seaside Park (top) and Olsemagle Revle (bottom right).



constructed on two long, narrow offshore barrier                      the artificial dunes Ammophila arenaria was planted in
islands. The new artificially advanced coastline is con-                  1978. All other species occurring in the area in 1992
nected with the original natural coastline by bridges                   have been invading as a result of primary succession
and dykes. Behind the offshore barriers are six lagoons.                  (Hansen & Vestergaard, 1986). Several facilities for visitors
The following vegetation types and plant communities are                  are available: harbours, roads, parking areas, toilets, life
present: sandy beach, sand dunes, grasslands, former                    guards, ice-cream stands, etc. Being closer to Copen-
tidal meadows, lagoon shores, roadsides, shrubberies, and                 hagen city and having all the recreational facilities,
small planted groves. The grasslands were sown in 1979                   Kege Bay Seaside Park is visited by more than 500,000
with a seed mixture of grasses consisting of Festuca rubra,                people each year. In contrast, Olsemagle Revle receives
F. arundinaeea, Lolium multiflorum and L. perenne. In                   less than 100,000 visitors in the same period.
                                       T r a m p l i n g o f Danish coastal vegetation                                                                            225

 Table 1. Percentage frequency of 32 taxa including bare soil in +, trampled path centre, and -, untrampled surroundings at five sites

Site 1, m o w n grassland; site 2 u n m o w n grassland; site 3, artificial dune; site 4, natural salt marsh; site 5, natural dune, The species
are tested by likelihood-ratio X 2 for whether their occurrence is independent of trampling impact. Results are divided into groups ac-
cording to their response. G 2 -- Likelihood ratio value (d.f. -- 1) *** p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. Favoured, species occurring
only o n the paths; Vulnerable, species occurring only in untrampled situations; Indifferent, species occurring in b o t h situations.

Species                       Site 1                       Site 2                       Site 3                      Site 4               Site 5     G2   Significance

                         +                         +                         +                       +          -         +



Favoured
  Bare soil         100                100                100             25         100          100             85          -        100      60  52.099    ***
  Elytrigia repens       --                --                              --         90          30             --          30        --          3-897    *
  Festuca arundinacea      10                --                80              5                    .            .          .         .            20.103    ***
  Glaux maritima                         --                              --           --                       55          15        --       --   4.916    *
  Leymus arenarius      .                .             .          .           .        .        .          .                       75       25   5.788    *
Vulnerable
  Bryophytes          70                  90              65              70           --        100             --         20        60       85  23-971    ***
  Lichens           --                  --              --              5                    80                       --        --       10  28.338    ***
  Cirsium arvense        5                 30                             15           15         55             --                  --       --  13-101    ***
  Cerastium semidecandrum   .            .           .           .                                   30                       --        --       25  15.890    ***
  Erigeron acer         5                 --                 5             5            5        55                       --        --       --   6.220     *
  Holcus lanatus       --                  --                             95           .         .              .          .                   28.338    ***
  Hypochoeris radicata     .              .            .           .          .         .       .        .                             15       60   6-220     *
  R u m e x acetosella                         10               5            95           --                       --                  20       50  25.034    ***
  Tanacetum vulgare      .                .             .            .           .        .                                        15       80  10.700    **
  Trifolium arvense      10                  90                             65           --          20                      I         __       --  30.969    ***
  Viola tricolor       .                   .                   .               .           .                                      5       65  12.978    ***
Indifferent
  Agrostis stolonifera    --                  --              90            90            --          --          100           95        --       --   0.021    ns
  Ammophila arenaria     --                  --              90            100            .       .          .            .         .               0.130    ns
  Ammophila x Calamagrostis .                 .             .          .           .                                 5                 95      100  0-000    ns
  Chamaenerion angustifolium .            .           .         .                           30          65            .        .     .      .           2.911    ns
  Dactylis glomerata      15                30               65              60            .       .        .            .                          0 142    ns
  Festuca rubra       I00                100              100             100            30                     100           100        --      20   0.088    ns
  Festuca ovina                         --               --              --            80        100            .         .     .      .           0.543    ns
  Hippopha# rhamnoides    30                --                5             30            .       .        .              .         .               0.082    ns
  Honckenya peploides                      .                .               .             .                                         25       30   0.096    ns
  Lathyrusjaponicus                       --                                          60          45          --           --         5      30   0.000    ns
  Odontites verna       .              .             .           .          .         .                        95           95        --           0.00    ns
  Phragmites australis    25                  .         .        .          .                                   55           60        --          0.666    ns
  Plantago maritima      .                 .               .            .           .                         100           80        --       I   0-543    ns
  Poa pratensis        --                  10             10               15           --                      5           5        15       25   1.629    ns
  Scirpus maritimus      .             .            .        .             .                                   45           65        --       --   0.821    ns
  Taraxacum spp.       100                100               95              95            95        100            --           --        10       10   0-021    ns
  Trifolium repens      30                 5              100             100            --                      5           5        --          0-677    ns


METHODS                                                                             c e n t r e o f all five p a t h s 0.6 m a p a r t , a n d a s i m i l a r set o f
                                                                                q u a d r a t s p l a c e d i n t h e v e g e t a t i o n a l o n g s i d e , 2.5 m f r o m
Five paths, with a width of at least 1 m, and their sur-                                                    the centre of the path. Other studies have shown that
r o u n d i n g c o m m u n i t i e s w e r e s e l e c t e d as s u r v e y sites.                                      people tend to follow paths very strictly (Bayfield,
Three are situated in Koge Bay Seaside Park: one on                                                       1973; F r e d e r i k s e n ,    1977; K a r d e l l , 1978; H y l g a a r d ,
t o p o f t h e a r t i f i c i a l d u n e s (site 3) a n d t w o i n t h e g r a s s -                                    1980), a n d t h e r e f o r e t h e v e g e t a t i o n o u t s i d e t h e p a t h s
l a n d s b e h i n d t h e d u n e s . T h e g r a s s l a n d a t J~egerso (site                                       c a n b e r e g a r d e d as u n t r a m p l e d . A t o t a l o f 100 u n t r a m -
1) is c u t o n c e a y e a r a n d H i p p o p h a ~ r h a m n o i d e s is c o n -                                      p i e d a n d 100 t r a m p l e d p l o t s w e r e t h u s a n a l y s e d .
t r o l l e d w i t h h e r b i c i d e s , w h i l e t h e g r a s s l a n d a t Lille                                       In each plot the cover of individual species was mea-
Vejleso (site 2) is u n d e r g o i n g n a t u r a l d e v e l o p m e n t w i t h o u t                                    sured using the Hult-Sernander-DuRietz                  scale of cover
any management. Two paths are situated on Olsemagle                                                       c l a s s e s ( M a i m e r , 1974). I n t h e s t a t i s t i c a l t r e a t m e n t o f
R e v l e : o n e o n t h e d u n e t o p (site 5) a n d o n e i n t h e s a l t                                        data the cover values were transformed into the follow-
m a r s h (site 4). ( F i g . 1). T h e p a t h s i n K o g e B a y S e a s i d e                                        i n g p e r c e n t a g e v a l u e s ( H a n s e n & J e n s e n , 1972): less
P a r k a r e u s e d b y a p p r o x i m a t e l y 10 v i s i t o r s e a c h d a y                                      t h a n 1/16 = 2 % ; 1 / 1 6 - 1 / 8 = 9%; 1 / 8 - 1 / 4 = 18%; 1 / 4 - 1 / 2
(yearly average, according to the Park headquarters).                                                      = 36%; a n d m o r e t h a n 1/2 = 7 2 % . F r e q u e n c y o f species
T h e u s e o f t h e p a t h s a t t 0 1 s e m a g l e R e v l e is n o t k n o w n .                                     w a s m e a s u r e d as t h e p e r c e n t a g e o c c u r r e n c e in t h e 1 - m 2
H o w e v e r , f r o m c o u n t s d u r i n g t h e s u r v e y it is e s t i m a t e d                                    plots. Species diversity was measured as number of
t h a t t h e p a t h s a r e u s e d b y five v i s i t o r s d a i l y .                                           species per plot based on an average from 20 plots.
   I n J u l y 1993, 20 1 - m 2 q u a d r a t s w e r e p l a c e d a l o n g t h e                                      P l a n t n o m e n c l a t u r e f o l l o w s H a n s e n (1981).
226                                                     Ulla          Vogt          Andersen


Table 2. Percentage frequencies of 33 taxa grouped according to their relative occurrence on either trampled path (+) or untrampled
                             surroundings (-)
                    For explanation of sites and categories, see Table 1.

Species                             Site 1                                         Site 2                          Site 3                                     Site 4                          Site 5
                               +                  -                      +                                +                 --                  +                  --              +




Favoured
  Lolium   perenne                                   --                     20                                --                  --                  5                --              --        --
  Poa  annua                     --                 --                           5          .            .           .                .              .              .            .
  Spergularia    marina              .              .                      .                .          .                                             35                  --
  Tussilago   fitrfara                 5                .                      .                  .                .                 .                    .                  .
Vulnerable
  Aira praecox                                       .                    .                .              .             .                    .                .                               10
  Anthyllis   vulneraria            --                       5                  --                  5              .                 .                .              .              .
  Arenaria   serpyllifolia                               .              .                .        .                                   5                                  --              --
  A triplex prostrata     ssp.  prostrata   .                .                      .                .            .             .                                                   5
  Carduus   crispus               .      .            .          .                                5              --                                   --                  --
  Conyza   canadensis                                  --                     --                                --                   5                                  --              --          5
  Galium   verum                .              .                      .                .                                          5                                  --              --        --
  Leontodon     autumnalis           .            .                    .                  .            .          .             .                                           10
  Melilotus   alba               --                       5                  --                  5              .                 .                .              .              .
  Plantago    lanceolata                                 --                     ---               15               .         .              .            .
  Rosa   canina                                      --                     --                  5              .             .              .              .            .            .
  Rumex    crispus               .          .                  .                  .          .                                     5                                  --              --        --
  Tragopogon     pratensis                               --                     --                                --                  10                .            .            .        .
  Trifolium   dubium                                  --                     --                30               --                                                     --
  Triglochin   maritimum            .            .                  .                  .          .            .                                                            5
  Senecio   vernalis                                   .              .                .        .                                   10                --                  --              20        85
  Vicia sativa    ssp.  angusti~blia      --                   10                     --                5               .               .                .              .              .
  Vicia hirsuta                                      --                     --                35               .           .              .            .            .            .
Indifferent
  Artemisia    vulgaris               10                 15                         5                            .               .                .              .              .
  Carex   arenaria                .        .                  .              .                                  30                   5                --                --               --
  Cerastium    fontanum    ssp.  triviale      5                  5                    --                  5              .               .                  .              .              .
  Elytrigia   juneeiforme                                 .                      .                  .                .                   .                                               35        10
  Juncus   gerardi                .          .                    .                  .          .            .                                       15                  15
  Lotus   tenuis                 .          .                  .                .            .                                                     10                  25              --        --
  Potentilla   anserina             .                    .                        .                  .                                               10                  15
  Rosa   rugosa                                      --                     --                5                10                  30                                 --               --
  TriJolium   pratense              15                    5                     --                10               .             .                .              .
  Triglochin   palustre             .              .                    .                  .                                                            5                15              --        --
  Vicia craeca                                       .              .                .        .          .                                           5                10



  Species resistance to h u m a n trampling and their abil-                                                    all sites is shown in Tables 1 and 2. Figure 2 shows the
ity to regenerate is to a large extent dependent u p o n                                                      n u m b e r o f species in each plant community. The high-
the position o f their growth points and surviving buds                                                       est n u m b e r o f species (24), was f o u n d in the u n m o w n
(Burden & Randerson, 1972; Liddle & Greig-Smith,                                                          grassland o f site 2. The total n u m b e r o f species was
1975b; H y l g a a r d & Liddle, 1981). Raunki~er's (1934)                                                     reduced significantly by the trampling impact at all
life-form classification o f species is therefore used here.                                                     sites (Table 3), although in the m o w n grassland (site 1)
G r a m i n o i d s (including Poaceae, Juncaceae and Cyper-                                                     the same n u m b e r occurred in b o t h situations, and in
aceae) are treated as a special g r o u p because o f their                                                     the natural salt m a r s h (site 4) little difference was
flexible, linear leaves, and their ability to regenerate                                                       found. The reduction was m o s t noticeable a m o n g the
after trampling (Bates, 1935; Chappell e t a L , 1971;                                                        forbs, in contrast to the grasses o f which there are
Page e t a l . , 1985).                                                                       generally m o r e species on the trampled path.
  Paths and u n t r a m p l e d surroundings were c o m p a r e d                                                   The species diversity o f the communities was gener-
with respect to the frequency o f occurrence o f 30                                                         ally low and the highest diversity (>8 species/m 2) was
species, together with bare soil, lichens, and bryo-                                                         f o u n d in the u n m o w n , u n t r a m p l e d grassland (site 2)
phytes, using a likelihood-ratio X2-test. The remaining                                                       (Fig. 3). The diversity decreased significantly as a result
n u m b e r o f species (22) occurred too infrequently for                                                      o f the trampling impact. The reduction was largest in
the X2-test to be valid.                                                                       the natural dune and in the u n m o w n grassland,
                                                                                   whereas no reduction occurred on the path in the salt
                                                                                   marsh, site 4.
RESULTS
                                                                                     The total vegetation cover was decreased by tram-
F r e q u e n c y o f species measured on the trampled path                                                     pling impact (Fig. 4). Bryophytes and lichens were
centres c o m p a r e d with the u n t r a m p l e d surroundings at                                                 severely reduced while grass cover was m o s t reduced in
                       Trampling of Danish coastal vegetation                                   227

   30
                                      12t
                                   .=
   25                                  10
                                   E
                                   El,
•8
 )  20                                   8F
                       +            g

                                   13




                i!!j
                                   ¢n
   10                               "6


                                       2~
                                   Z


    0                                   0
      Site 1   Site 2    Site 3  Site 4    Site 5           Site 1     Site 2   Site 3      Site 4    Site 5
       Forbs      Grasses    •  W o o d y sp.                r~ + Trampling     []   - Trampling

Fig. 2. Number of vascular plant species at five sites: site 1,   Fig. 3. Diversity measured as number of species per m 2 (aver-
mown grassland; site 2, unmown grassland; site 3, artificial     age based on 20 m 2) on the trampled path centre (+) com-
dune; site 4, natural saltmarsh; site 5, natural dune. The          pared with the untrampled surroundings ( ) .
species are divided into forbs, graminoids (Poaceae,
Juncaceae and Cyperaceae), and woody species on the             150
trampled centre of the paths (+) compared with the untrampled
            surroundings ( ) ,
                                      120            +
                                   &           .    !                ÷

the dune communities (sites 3 and 5). In contrast the                                   J
percentage cover o f other vascular plants was not
significantly reduced (Table 3). F o r instance, Trifolium
repens and Taraxacum spp. showed higher cover values
on the trampled paths.                        ¢J

  Figure 5 shows the percentage distribution of life-           30
forms in the five sites (untrampled surroundings). It
appears that the vegetation of the grasslands as well as
the salt m a r s h is strongly d o m i n a t e d by hemicrypto-       0
                                         Site 1     Site 2    Site       Site 4     Site 5
phytes. In the artificial dune, annuals (therophytes) are              • Lichena             [ ] Bryophytes
                                          [ ] Grasses            -7 Other vncular plants
the prevalent life-form, whereas in the natural dune the
therophytes, hemicryptophytes and geophytes are           Fig. 4. Percentage cover of lichens, bryophytes, graminoids
almost equally important. The category 'others' (which        (Poaceae, Juncaceae and Cyperaceae), and other vascular
includes c h a m a e p h y t e s and phanerophytes) was only     plants on trampled path centres (+) and untrampled
represented on the sites in the m a n - m a d e K o g e Bay                surroundings (-).
Seaside Park. The n u m b e r o f therophytes was strongly
                                      80
reduced and there was also a significant reduction in
hemicryptophytes. The n u m b e r o f geophytes increased

                                      80   e
Table 3. Results of a t-test based on the differences between
trampled path and untrampled surroundings, calculated from
   the everage and standard deviation of the five sites
                                      40                                      e
                 Increase/    t-test, d.f.=4   o
                                   u
                 decrease a                                      5


Total number of species        ( )     2.4650   *       20
Diversity (species per m 2)      (-)     2.1738   *
Number of graminoids         (+)     1.6771   ns
Number of forbs            ( )     3.1534   *       0
Number of therophytes         (-)     2.9418   *          Site 1      Site 2     Site 3        Site 4    Site 5
Number of hermicryptophytes      (-)     6.7083   **              Therophytes           [] Hemieryptophytea
Number of geophytes          (+)     1-1181   ns           []   Geophytes          •    Others
Number of other life-forms      (-)     0.6594   ns
Percentage cover of graminoids    (-)     3.8351   **   Fig. 5. Percentage distribution of the life-forms (according to
Percentage cover of other species   (-)     0.6416   ns   Raunki~er, 1934) in the five communities in the untrampled
                                   situations. The category 'others' includes chamaephytes and
"+, overall increase as a result of the tramplings; -, overall    phanerophytes. The numbers above the columns indicate the
decrease.                                     number of species in each category.
228                               Ulla Vogt Andersen

    '°I                                 would cause complete loss of vegetation in both dunes
                                      and salt marsh; 2889 passages were found to reduce the
                                      vegetation cover of Ammophila-dominated dunes by
    60-
                   12                  50% (Boorman & Fuller, 1977).
              16                   10
         8                               Like any other disturbance, trampling can create

g
¢p
    *°i                                 open spaces for new species to become established
                                      (Sousa, 1984). For example, Spergularia marina, an an-
                                      nual which is unable to establish in a dense, saturated
                                      community, was only recorded on the path in the salt
                                      marsh. Similarly some species, such as Glaux maritima,



                   i,
    2O                                  cannot persist in untrampled situations where faster-
                                      growing more competitive species tend to dominate
                                      (Burden Randerson, 1972).
    0    o      1                         Some vascular plants, such as Trifolium repens, can
       Site 1     Site 2  Site 3    Site 4    Site 5
                                      withstand light trampling and take advantage of the
           Vulnerable [] Favoured  []   Indifferent
                                      suppression of more sensitive neighbours by forming
Fig. 6. All species were divided into three categories, i.e. vul-      dense mats as on path 2. On the other hand, both
nerable, favoured, or indifferent. Their percentages in the un-
trampled situation of the five communities were recorded.          lichens and bryophytes appear to be very vulnerable to
Numbers above the columns indicate the actual number of           trampling, as found by Hylgaard (1980) and Bowles
          species in the category.                and Maun (1982). The reason is that these plants break
                                      easily under dry conditions and trampling in coastal
                                      ecosystems is often more prevalent in dry weather.
on the trampled paths in all communities, but this in-           Lichens are hardly ever able to regenerate after tram-
crease was not significant (Table 3).                    pling, as they are dependent on organic matter
  All species are classified as vulnerable, favoured, or         (Johnsen & Sochting, 1993), which is also reduced by
indifferent according to their scores in the )(2-test           wear.
(Table 1), or their relative occurrences on either the            Species like Trifolium arvense, Viola tricolor and
paths or the untrampled surroundings if their numbers            Cerastium semidecandrum are easily damaged mechani-
are too low for the test to be valid (Table 2). There ap-          cally, because their delicate, erect stems dry out early in
peared to be a significantly lower number of occur-             the season. As they possess no buds from which they
rences on the path centre of all species in the               can regenerate, they are very vulnerable to trampling.
'vulnerable' group, whereas species in the 'favoured'            It is often considered that rosette plants can withstand
group showed a strong significance for occurrence on            trampling impact (Bates, 1935; Burden & Randerson,
the trampled path. Figure 6 shows the distribution of            1972), but the present study indicates that some rosette
species in the three categories in untrampled surround-           species are vulnerable, for instance Hypochoeris radi-
ings at the five study sites. Vulnerable species              cata and Leontodon autumnalis.
contributed the majority in the dunes (sites 3 and 5)
and in the unmanaged grassland (site 2). The mown              Grassland and salt marsh
grassland (site 1) had an almost equal number of              After 15 years the grasslands in Koge Bay Seaside Park
vulnerable and indifferent species, while the salt marsh          consist mainly of naturally colonized species (Hansen &
(site 4) was dominated by indifferent species. All five           Vestergaard, 1986). They differ from the natural salt
sites were tested for differences in number of vulnerable          marsh, because they are never flooded and therefore
and resistant (-- favoured + indifferent) species. The           lack typical halophytic vegetation. The grasslands con-
salt marsh, site 4, differed significantly from the un-          tain a lower number of resistant geophytes and a higher
mown grassland, site 2 (G 2 -- 5.718, d.f. -- 1, p -- 0-017        number of vulnerable therophytes compared with the
*), and the dune communities, site 3 (G 2 -- 6.325, d.f. =         salt marsh and therefore appear to be significantly
1, p = 0.012 *), and site 5 (G ~ = 4.794, d.f. -- 1, p =          more vulnerable to the impact of human trampling.
0-029 *).                                   Although the mown grassland (site 1) and the
                                      unmown grassland (site 2) are on similar soils, have the
DISCUSSION                                 same initially sown species, and have been open to col-
                                      onization from the same sources, they are quite differ-
The trampling in the five communities (estimated to be           ent as a result of management. The mown grassland
1815-3630 passages per year) can be considered as very          possesses fewer species overall and a lower species
light, even though it creates paths and reduces the veg-          diversity, but more species indifferent to trampling than
etation cover and species diversity, because the paths           the unmown grassland. The vegetation structure and
retain a persistent vegetation. The actual use of the           the floristic composition of both trampled and untram-
paths, i.e. the number of visitors per year, is very diffi-        pied situations in site 1 are very similar to those of the
cult to measure, as it varies throughout the year and is          trampled situation at site 2. Species which are favoured
largely dependent on weather conditions. According to           by trampling are to some extent also favoured by mow-
Burden and Randerson (1972) 7500 passages per year             ing (Grime, 1979; Bakker, 1985). The mown grassland
                    Trampling o f Danish coastal vegetation                     229

does not differ significantly in vulnerability to tram-    dynamic stage, even if it also changes the vegetation
pling from the natural salt marsh, which has a naturally   composition and decreases the species diversity in the
resistant vegetation. It appears that mowing once a      more vulnerable communities. In the artificial coastal
year can change the vegetation towards a more resis-     area the landscape configurations are square, linear and
tant type, but mowing has not increased either the      straight, and creation of paths has provided a more
number of grasses or the total vegetation cover. Both     natural appearance to the landscape. A controlled,
these features are believed to contribute to increasing    light trampling impact, of for instance 5-10 visitors per
the resistance of a community (Hylgaard & Liddle,       day, may contribute to securing the continuation of an
1981; Bakker, 1985).                     open vegetation.
                                 Human trampling at the present levels involves no
Dunes                             serious detrimental effects on the five communities
The dunes appear to be the most vulnerable of the      studied. If, however, the number of visitors should
communities studied in respect to vegetation cover, as    increase, a loss of important species, destruction of veg-
they have a high percentage of sensitive species and few   etation cover and erosion are likely, and impoverish-
that benefit from trampling. Vehicle traffic affects     ment of the landscape and recreational values may
dunes more than grasslands with respect to vegetation    result. Management can improve the recreational carry-
cover (Hosier & Eaton, 1980). No significant differ-     ing capacity of the area, but even low-intensity man-
ences in vulnerability were found between the artificial   agement can change the original vegetation and
dunes of Koge Bay Seaside Park and the natural dunes     landscape morphology.
of ~Olsemagle Revle. In both sites the trampled area was    Artificial coastal areas may relieve some of the pres-
characterized by geophytes typical of the embryonic or    sure on the natural beaches, but creation of man-made
mobile dunes. In contrast the surrounding stabilized     coastal ecosystems cannot solve the problems of wear.
dunes had a more dense vegetation cover, many annual     Building of artificial coastal areas is rarely possible,
species, and a similar low percentage of open ground as   and can never of course compensate for the reduction
in the mown grassland. The vegetation of embryonic      of natural areas caused by human disturbance. Plant
and mobile dunes consists primarily of geophytes, able    communities created on an artificial basis can be
to regenerate after natural erosion processes as well as   equally vulnerable to the impact of human trampling as
after trampling, in contrast to other pioneer communi-    those created through natural processes.
ties where the vegetation normally consists of annuals.
The number of therophytes and 'others' is larger in sta-
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
bilized dunes (Raunki~er, 1934). The man-made dunes of
Koge Bay Seaside Park, which contains a higher num-      I would like to thank Gitte Calov, Jorgen Jensen, and
ber of annuals and woody species, are in a more ad-      Kjeld Hansen for critical and constructive comments
vanced stage of succession compared with the natural     on the manuscript. Appreciation is extended to Koge
dunes. Even if ¢01semagle Revle is considerably older     City municipal authorities for providing mapping mate-
than the Seaside Park the latter appears to have a      rial and to the park headquarters of Koge Bay Seaside
higher 'ecological age'. Stabilized dunes are consider-    Park for information on management, visitors num-
ably more vulnerable to trampling than mobile dunes      bers, etc. This research was funded by a grant from the
(Hylgaard, 1981; Johnsen & Sochting, 1993).          Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University.
  The dunes of NW-Europe are in some places threat-
ened by eutrophication and afforestation leading to
undesired stabilization (van der Laan, 1985). Efforts     REFERENCES
such as grazing are made to reverse vegetation succes-    Bakker, J. P. (1985). The impact of grazing on plant commu-
sion, to stimulate sand movement and to secure the dy-     nities, plant populations and soil conditions on salt
namic dune processes (van Dijk, 1992). The impact of      marshes. Vegetatio, 62, 391-8.
human trampling in the sites studied helps to keep the    Bates, G. H. (1935). The vegetation of footpaths, sidewalks,
                                cart-tracks and gateways. J. Ecol., 23, 470-87.
dunes in a young, non-stabilized stage and can be used    Bayfield, N. G. (1973). Use and deterioration of some Scot-
for the conservation of mobile dunes.              tish hill paths. J. Appl. Ecol., 10, 635~14.
  Mobile dunes can easily regenerate after disturbance    Beeftink, W. G. (1979). The structure of salt marsh communi-
as no changes are induced in the basic soil conditions.     ties in relation to environmental disturbances. In Ecological
In the grasslands and salt marsh, where soil moisture     processes in coastal environments, ed. R. L. Jefferies & A. J.
                                Davy. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 77-93.
levels are higher, trampling may result in irreversible    Boorman, L. A. & Fuller, R. M. (1977). Studies on the im-
changes in the soil, and there may be problems for re-     pact of paths on the dune vegetation at Winterton, Nor-
generation of the vegetation cover on compacted soil      folk, England. Biol. Conserv., 12, 203-16.
after heavy trampling (Beeftink, 1979).            Bowles, J. M. & Maun, M. A. (1982). A study of the effects
                                of trampling on the vegetation of Lake Huron sand dunes
                                at Provincial Park. Biol. Conserv., 24, 273-83.
CONCLUSION                          Burden, R. F. & Randerson, P. F. (1972). Quantitative stud-
                                ies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an
Light trampling is beneficial to seashore communities,     aid to the management of semi-natural areas. J. Appl.
because it keeps the vegetation in an immature,         Ecol., 9, 439-57.
230                             Ulla Vogt Andersen

Carlson, L. H. & Godfrey, P. J. (1989). Human impact man-        overvdgning, forvaltning og Jorskning, ed. C. H. Ovesen &
  agement in a coastal recreation and natural area. Biol.        P. Vestergaard. Skov-og Naturstyrelsen, Copenhagen, pp.
  Conserv., 49, 141-56.                         58-63 (English summary).
Chappell, H. G., Ainsworth, J. F., Cameron, R. A. D. &         Kardell, L. (1978). Vegetationsslitage   Katastrof eller bara
  Redfern, M. (1971). The effect of trampling on a chalk        offtgenhet? Sveriges Lantbruks Universitet, Avdelningen for
  grassland ecosystem. J. Appl. Ecol., 8, 869-82.            Landskapsv &rd, Rap., No. 12.
Edmond, D. B. (1962). Effects of treading pasture in summer      Liddle, M. J. & Greig-Smith, P, (1975a). A survey of tracks
  under different soil moisture levels. N . Z . J . Agric. Res., 5,   and paths in a sand dune ecosystem, I. Soils. J. Appl. Ecol.,
  389-95.                                12, 893-908.
Frederiksen, P. (1977). Turistslitage i et klitlandskab, Skallin-   Liddle, M. J. & Greig-Smith, P. (1975b). A survey of tracks
  gen 1976. Geogr. Tidsskr., 76, 68-77.                 and paths in a sand dune ecosystem, II. Vegetation. J.
Goldsmith, F. B., Munton, R. J. C. & Warren, A. (1970).          Appl. Ecol., 12, 908-30.
  The impact of recreation on the ecology and amenity of       McDonell, M. J. (1981). Trampling effects on coastal dune
  semi-natural areas: methods of investigation used in the       vegetation in the Parker River National Wildlife Refuge,
  Isles of Scilly. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2, 287-306.           Massachusetts, USA. Biol. Conserv., 21,289-301.
Gravesen, P. & Vestergaard, P. (1969). Vegetation of a Dan-       Magnusson, M. (1986). M~mniskans p~verkan p~t Sandham-
  ish off-shore barrier island. Bot. Tidsskr., 65, 44~69.        merens dynomr~,de i syd6stra Sk~ne. Sv. Bot. Tidskr., 80,
Grime, J. P. (1979). Plant strategies and vegetation processes.      81 93 (English summary).
  J. Wiley, Chichester.                        Malmer, N. (1974). Scandinavian approach to vegetation sci-
Hansen, K. (1981). DanskJeltflora. Gyldendal, Copenhagen.         ence. Medd. Avd. Ekol. Bot.. Univ. Lund, 2.
Hansen, K & Jensen, J. (1972). The vegetation on roadsides       Meijer, L. W. (1992). Recreation in the Dutch Wadden dune
  in Denmark. Qualitative and quantitative composition.         areas, a curse or a blessing. In Dune management in the
  Dansk Bot. Ark., 28, 1 61.                       Wadden Sea area. Proc. Trilateral Working Conference,
Hansen, K. & Vestergaard, P. (1986). Initial establishment of       3rd, ed. G. Hilgerloh. Nordeney, Germany 8-12 September
  vegetation in a man-made coastal area in Denmark. Nord.        1991, pp. 55-61.
  J. Bot., 6, 479-95.                         Page, R. R., da Vinha, S. G. & Agnew, A. D. Q. (1985). The
Hosier, P. E. & Eaton, T. E. (1980). The impact of vehicles        reaction of some sand-dune plant species to experimentally
  on dune and grassland vegetation on a south-eastern North       imposed environmental change: a reductionist approach to
  Carolina barrier beach. J. Appl. Ecol., 17, 173 82.          stability. Vegetatio, 61, 105 14.
Hylgaard, T. (1980). Recovery of plant communities on          Raunki~er, C. (1934). The IifeJorms of plants and statistical
  coastal sand-dunes disturbed by human trampling. Biol.         plant geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  Conserv., 19, 15-25.                         Sousa, W. P. (1984). The role of disturbance in natural com-
Hylgaard, T. & Liddle M. J. (1981). The effect of human          munities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 15, 353-91.
  trampling on a sand dune ecosystem dominated by Em-         van der Laanl, D. (1985). Changes in the flora of the coastal
 petrum nigrum. J. Appl. Ecol., 18, 559 69.               dunes of Voorne (The Netherlands) in relation to environ-
Jensen, F. (1993). Dunes - - managements and threats. In         mental changes. Vegetatio, 61, 87-95.
  Danske klitter - - overv~gning, forvaltning og forskning, ed.    van Dijk, H. W. J. (1992). Grazing dc.mestic livestock in
  C. H. Ovesen & P. Vestergaard. Skov-og Naturstyrelsen,         Dutch coastal dunes: experiments, experiences and perspec-
  Copenhagen, pp. 25-31 (English summary).                tives. In Coastal dunes, ed. Carter, R. G. W., Curtis, T. G.
Johnsen, I. & Soehting, U. (1993). Lichens dominated heath-        F. & Sheehy-Skeffington, M. J. Balkema, Rotterdam. pp.
  lands - - dynamics and vulnerability. In Danske klitter - -      235 50.
by Sarah Freed last modified 14-11-2009 14:19
 

Built with Plone